
House is back, and it's good but not as reinvigorating as last year's reality show take-off. Ever since adding three new team members for House's department and banishing the original Scoobies to the far corners of the hospital, fans have complained about the apparent dismissal of Chase and Cameron, and decreasing screentime for Cuddy and Wilson. The party line is that House is not an ensemble drama, but a show about the character of House and the people he interacts with.
Soaking up Mad Men's return (after skipping a week so fans could instead watch the cast and crew accept their Emmys), I couldn't help but be reminded of the House situation. Mad Men just had an episode focused as much on minor character Freddie Rumsen as it was on Don Draper, and yet the series at large is specifically about Don Draper and the people he interacts with.
What's more, seasons of Mad Men are about half as long as those of House (13 episodes compared to 24 for House), and while Mad Men usually runs about 5 minutes longer on average thanks to AMC airing fewer commercials, House still has the clear win on screentime.
Yet, House can't even manage 9 characters. The new response to such criticism is that there will be an episode this season dedicated to Chase and Cameron. Great news. A whole episode for two cast members!
Meanwhile, Mad Men studies carefully Don and his wife Betty, rising copy-writer Peggy, accounts alien Pete, creative poseur Paul, closeted husband Sal, bachelor Ken, TV head Harry, executive Roger, and fabulous Joan. On top of the 10 main cast members, we've got Duck Phillips, Jimmy and Bobbie Barrett, Freddie Rumsen, Arthur Case, Father Gill, every so often Francine, and the family and mistresses of almost everyone--I believe we've now had significant scenes involving all ten characters' families, right? Not that we know, say, Roger's wife Mona or Sal's wife Kitty very well, but we've seen them or heard them discussed just enough to give us a clear picture of their tracks through life.
And House is complaining about not having enough time for anyone but House and his department?
I want to make it clear that I, personally, have no problem with the way House has handled its characters to this point. Ever since Cameron, Chase, and Foreman quit, I was hoping they would be gone or phased out for the sake of realism. I do wish for more Cuddy and Wilson, since Lisa Edelstein, Robert Sean Leonard, and Hugh Laurie are by far the best actors on the show. But it's not that big of a deal for me.
Still, failing to effectively utilize the entire cast is sign of diminishing creativity. In recent years, Dawson's Creek, The OC, Veronica Mars, and Friday Night Lights each had falling approval ratings (popularly and critically) during seasons that featured separate storylines and sometimes flat-out neglect for supporting characters.
This isn't endemic to teen dramas either. I recently ranted about this season of Weeds cutting three cast members and dividing the rest into storylines that never connected. The general consensus regarding Six Feet Under is that Season 4 is the low point, due to the phenomenon of irreversibly divergent plots. And the Lost writers learned a thing or two about backlash during their Season 3 fall pod, which returned from hiatus without resolving the cliffhanger for episodes because they were too focused on one small (dare I say, unpopular?) segment of the cast.
But take a show like Arrested Development. 9 main characters with only twenty-two minutes per episode, and still everyone had something to do each episode (with a few exceptions). Or The Wire, with something like 30 characters each season (probably more by Season 5, depending on the ratio of dead old characters to new arrivals) and online character charts that are practically necessary to understand what's going on. Battlestar Galactica not only explores humanity at all levels of leadership, but also the cylons and, in some cases, their vastly different duplicates. Not to mention The Sopranos, the godfather of all television character studies, had plenty of time for Tony's two families and his psychiatrist and her associates.
Of course, none of these are mystery shows, with the A-plot each week involving a guest actor and most of the screentime devoted to the show's lead detective solving the case. I understand the limitations of the format for House. But then I think about Veronica Mars, whose budget was so low only three characters could be in every episode. Nevertheless, in one season, Mars conveyed an entire town's worth of real people thanks to its efficient focus on the supporting cast. Mac couldn't be in every episode, but they made the scenes she had count, and by Season 3 she joined the cast full time.
It's getting difficult to defend the House writers. Better shows than this have overcome the ensemble problem while focusing predominantly on exploring the lead (Mad Men, Veronica Mars, The Sopranos). Not to pile it on, but these shows also delved much deeper into their leads than House does, and Veronica Mars hit that blend of comedy-drama more consistently.
House remains wonderful entertainment. Tellingly, they just introduced a House-like PI played by Michael Weston in the hopes of a potential spinoff series. While I'm not opposed to a House-like PI show, maybe the writers should focus more on the characters they already have--even if it means axing a couple of them--before worrying about dividing their attention even further.




